July 3, 2007

Stafford Loan limits raised July 1 2007

Posted in Saving for College, Stafford Loans, Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 10:07 AM by Joe From Boston


If you’re hoping to get a Stafford Loan, there’s good news – the annual borrowing limit has been raised in many cases! Here’s a chart to help you wade through all that information:

Federal Stafford Annual loan limits:

Before July 1, 2007 After July 1 2007
Freshman (dependent – independent) $2,625 $6,625 $3,500 $7,500
Sophomore (dependent – independent) $3,500 $7,500 $4,500 $8,500
Junior (dependent – independent) $5,500 $10,500 (no change)
Senior (dependent – independent) $5,500 $10,500 (no change)
Graduate/professional student* $18,500 $20,500

*Graduate/professional students are considered independent

Lifetime loan limits:

Dependent undergraduate $23,000 (no change)
Independent undergraduate $46,000 (no change)
Graduate/professional student** $138,500 (no change)

** The graduate lifetime Stafford loan limit includes any Stafford loans received for undergraduate study

All material copyright July 2007, https://parentstudentloans.wordpress.com

June 27, 2007

eSignature – what’s the difference between that and a real signature?

Posted in Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 8:50 AM by Joe From Boston


Here’s a question I hear a lot:  “What is an eSignature?

An eSignature (sometimes written ESignature, e-signature, or even eSig) is simply an”electronic signature”.  It’s an electronic way of verifying that you are who you say you are, and that you agree to the transaction you are trying to complete.

Here at the Student Loan Network, we offer eSignature for consolidation, as do most lenders.

So what does this mean for you, the borrower?

It means that if you qualify for eSignature, you can electronically sign your application right away and have it go into processing immediately, instead of having the application mailed to you, you sign it, you mail it back to the company, etc…

How does it work?

When you lender determines that you are eligible, you’ll get an email with a link to click on and typically some sort of login information or passphrase.  You click on the link and follow the directions on screen.

You’ll be asked to double-check your information such as name, address, references, etc.  Often, you’ll also be asked to verify credit-based occurrences in your past, such as the name of the bank where you took out your last car loan, or the monthly payment on your mortgage.  This is to make sure that no one else is trying to use your personal information fraudulently.

Lastly, you’ll be asked to read the terms and conditions of the loan and agree to them.  Often, you’ll see check boxes saying you agree to the various terms.  You’ll likely have to type in a sentence agreeing to it all or type you name in to finalize the process.

That’s it?

Yup, that’s it.  It’s not rocket science, just a way of getting your loan into processing faster and at your convenience.

June 22, 2007

Avoid College Selection Hysteria

Posted in Saving for College, Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 8:21 AM by Joe From Boston


I’d never heard a name put to this before, but I do remember vividly what he’s talking about!  Parents and Teens should read this very interesting article from the Capitol Online – HometownAnnapolis.com website.

Teens, parents should avoid College Selection Hysteria

by Dr. Scott Smith

There is probably no concern that is more potent or palpable for many teenagers and their families than the experience of College Selection Hysteria, or CSH. While it is not yet an “official” psychological diagnosis, CSH is an often-observed phenomenon that starts to grip many adolescents and their parents around the beginning of their junior year of high school. This amplified form of anxiety is based in concern or worry about finding, being admitted to and paying for the “right” college.

 

Symptoms of CSH can include mental confusion, sleepless nights, worry, difficulty concentrating and irritability. If left untreated, it can lead to conflict between parents and children, feelings of helplessness, hopelessness and despair. Fortunately, CSH is treatable and even preventable.Like so many other mass phenomena, CSH is partly driven by the media attention that has been paid to the issue of college selection in recent years. It is further amplified by the rising number of college applications that are occurring nationwide. This surge in applications and the resulting increase in competition for the “top” schools are expected to remain high until 2014. As a result, CSH may be at an all-time high due to increasing fear that a college-bound student won’t be able to get into the “right” school and that this will place him at a significant life disadvantage.

Stoking the fires of this hysteria are the numerous publications which purport to be experts at rating or gauging the country’s “best” colleges. This American penchant for rating and categorizing things only serves to amplify another predisposition – competitiveness – which contributes greatly to the development of CSH. In truth, there are many great schools out there to attend and there is likely to be a good school to match just about anyone.

To help with CSH, my alma mater, Washington and Lee University, runs a program for alumni titled, “Finding Your Way Through the College Admissions Maze.” One of the benefits of thiskind of program is that it helps students and parents realize they are not alone in their bewilderment and that many others feel much the same way they do: confused about the college admissions process.

The program, which features notable college admissions specialists, points out that there is a great deal of misinformation and misunderstanding about the admissions process. Trying to glean what I could from the wealth of information provided, it seems there are certain prevalent myths about getting into college which are in need of debunking. Some of the most harmful myths that exist with regard to the college selection process include the following:

If it’s not ranked highly by U.S. News and World Report, it isn’t a good college. This belief is simply wrong, wrong and wrong. It is important to remember your grandfather’s old adage not to believe everything you read. Unbeknownst to most people, the college rankings done by a variety of publications, including U.S. News and World Report, are blatantly speculative, unscientific and inherently flawed.

Often using years-old data and random bits and pieces of information, a significant percentage of these ratings are simply based upon how well known a college has become. There is little or no actual information or insight into the college itself or how well it may fit an individual student.

Searching for a college based upon this type of information is like choosing shoes because of their glitzy brand-name advertising, regardless of how they feel on your feet.

If I don’t attend a “name” college, I will be at a disadvantage my whole life. Again, this myth is wrong on many fronts. Research has consistently shown that the most important educational factor is whether or not you attend college and how you do when you are there – not the name of the college that you attend.

There are thousands of colleges and universities all over the United States, yet people tend to look at the same ones over and over again because their names – or more likely, their football teams – are familiar. This is not unlike the sad truth that many people choose elected officials on name recognition rather than their philosophies or proposed policies. It is important to know that there is a multitude of great colleges out there that fit almost any person, budget or educational goal.

I should get a scholarship, or at least get a discount on my college tuition. This is another myth that is fed by the media, which seems to imply that discounting is routine. Although prices vary widely and depend on a variety of factors, most people actually have to pay for college, and the availability of scholarships or even financial aid is much lower than people seem to realize. Colleges run like businesses, and if their customers aren’t paying for the product, they are unlikely to stay in business very long.

While there are some funds available, particularly for disadvantaged individuals, many people who fill out the required Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) find that they are not eligible for much of anything. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to reduce costs, but be realistic about how the system really works.

If my SAT scores or GPA aren’t high, I shouldn’t bother applying. If you like the school and you feel that it fits you well, go ahead and apply. Most of the “good” schools use a “whole person” concept and look for students who are motivated to attend college and who are active in their worlds.

Students who sit around and resume-build or stoke their GPAs and SATs without being truly involved or committed to meaningful activities are not as desirable as one might think. Colleges look for people with a unified theme of interests, activities and service in addition to working hard to get good grades.

For students, you might compare the process of selecting the right college to that of choosing which of many different parties you want to attend. No two parties are alike, and while they may have certain similarities, they are ultimately defined by their differences. It is impossible to compare them directly because they all have their own unique feel. Your party choice would most likely depend on who is there, what activities are offered, what food will be served and what music will be played. If you go to a party, simply because you think all the “in” people will be there, you are likely to end up totally bored and miserable.

To prevent the development of CSH, it is important to realize that there are many great schools out there and that the real challenge in college selection is finding the school that best matches you. This approach makes looking for a school an exciting adventure rather than a stressful competition. Instead of focusing on getting into a “top” school, try researching and visiting a variety of colleges to find out which ones you connect with.

After coming up with a general list, consider applying to two “reach” schools (difficult to get into), two “comfort” schools (schools that you have a good shot at) and two “safety” schools (schools you would expect to get into). After all the results are in, simply select your favorite available college and go have fun! And remember that it is more important to attend a school that matches you and facilitates your intellectual and personal growth than going to a school that looks good on paper.

Dr. Scott E. Smith is a licensed clinical psychologist with Spectrum Behavioral Health in Annapolis and Arnold. For services or ideas regarding this column, call 410-757-2077 or write to 1509 Ritchie Highway, Suite F, Arnold, MD 21012.

June 21, 2007

HEA Reauthorization act passed by Senate Committee

Posted in Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 9:32 AM by Joe From Boston


The Senate HELP Committee yesterday passed the HEA reauthorization with very little debate needed.  NASFAA reports on this:

Senate HELP Committee Passes HEA Reauthorization and Reconciliation Bills With Little Dissent

In just under an hour of deliberations, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee approved both the Higher Education Act Reauthorization and the Budget Reconciliation bills by wide margins. The two bills passed with the addition of only three amendments, which would make substantial changes to the federal student aid programs by raising $22 billion over five years for need-based aid and at the same time cutting approximately $1 billion in spending. These increases and savings would come at the expense of student loan providers in the form of subsidy cuts.

The HEA reauthorization bill (S. 1642), Higher Education Amendments of 2007, passed on a 20-0 vote and faced little opposition.

The budget reconciliation bill, Higher Education Access Act of 2007, received some debate, but still passed by an overwhelming 17-3 majority. Three Republican Senators – Judd Gregg (R-NH), Richard Burr (R-NC), and Wayne Allard (R-CO) – cast the dissenting votes.

Committee Chairman Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) voiced his approval of the passage of the two bills in a press release yesterday.

“This is a historic day for America’s students. The HELP Committee has passed two bills that will increase access to college and make sure scarce federal dollars are going where they are most needed – to students,” said Kennedy.

In his opening remarks at the committee meeting, Kennedy said that Congress had lost sight of the principle that “no qualified student should be denied the opportunity to attend college because of the cost.”

As a result, Kennedy stated than 400,000 qualified students do not attend a four-year college due to the costs and that those who do attend college are becoming increasingly burdened by student loan debt.

“Today, the average student leaves college with more than $19,000 in student loan debt. This mountain of debt is distorting countless Americans’ basic life choices,” said Kennedy.

According to Kennedy, the two bills would “restore the fundamental principle that guided the Higher Education Act at its inception – that no student should have to mortgage his or her future in order to pay for higher education today.”

While debate was limited, some Senators criticized the Democrats for using the budget reconciliation process to push through this sweeping legislation. Senator Gregg asked that the two bills be combined into just one bill, but other members of the Committee were resistant to the idea because it could allow Republicans to invoke the Byrd rule. The Byrd rule prohibits the Senate from considering “extraneous matter” as part of a reconciliation bill and could allow Republicans an opportunity to derail portions of the proposed legislation.

But Gregg also voiced his support of the student loan auction process as outlined in the Reconciliation bill, saying that he would like to see it expanded to the other loan programs. Currently it would be limited to PLUS loans.

Only three amendments were added to the proposed legislation. Two amendments that were proposed and added by Burr create two matching grant programs to promote financial literacy and encourage disadvantaged high school students to attend college. No details have yet been released on the two matching grant programs.

Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) also added an amendment that would ensure that no TRIO program would be required to participate in a program evaluation that requires recruiting students to serve as a control group. According to the amendment, the U.S. Department of Education would not be able to reward or penalize any institution for choosing to participate, or refusing to participate, in a study that requires such a control group.

Many are speculating that the College Cost Reduction Act, which was passed by the House Education Committee last week, may make it to the House floor for a vote as early as next week. The two Senate bills passed yesterday aren’t expected to reach a full Senate vote until sometime in July.

June 15, 2007

House passes College Cost Reduction Act of 2007

Posted in Consolidation, Parent PLUS Loans, Stafford Loans, Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 7:05 AM by Joe From Boston


A very interesting article on nchelp.org:

House Passes College Cost Reduction Act of 2007

As reported in yesterday’s briefing, the House Education and Labor Committee passed legislation by a 30 to 16 vote with all Democrats supporting the bill and the support of three Republicans.

The bill would cut roughly $19 billion from lender and guarantor fees and redirect these funds to student aid. Republican committee members stated that the Democrat’s proposal was “extracting too much blood” from lenders. Congressman Keller (R-FL) stated, “We’ve gone clean to the muscle and all the way to the bone,” in reference to the reduction of subsidies.

Ranking Member McKeon (R-CA) offered substitute legislation that would have cut lender and guarantor payments by roughly $13.8 billion and redirected those funds to Pell grants. Additionally, his legislation would have corrected current law to equalize Direct Loan and FFEL PLUS loan rates at 7.9 percent, invested $12 billion in Pell grants to increase the maximum grant by $350 in 2008, provided approximately $2 billion for deficit reduction and created no new entitlement spending. His proposal was not approved by the committee.

Press releases from Congressmen Miller and McKeon and further coverage by Congress Daily, CQ, Reuters, NASFAA, Inside Higher Ed, and the New York Times are included in the expanded edition of the Briefing.

June 6, 2007

Is it a negotiation or an appeal?

Posted in FAFSA, Parent PLUS Loans, Saving for College, Stafford Loans, Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 7:57 AM by Joe From Boston


Here’s a very interesting short Q&A from the OC Register. It points out a very important fact, that appealing your financial aid package is usually for extenuating circumstances.

PLANNING: The myth of negotiating financial aid

Tom Bottorf, Columnist

Q. Our daughter is beginning USC this fall as a freshman and received only a small grant from the university. I attended a financial aid presentation recently and heard that you can negotiate with the schools for more free money. How do we go about that?

A. This is an erroneous myth that continues to be spread by misinformed speakers on financial aid. Beware of any encouragement to negotiate with a college financial aid department. This myth creates false hope for many families. They are told that whatever the award, it’s probably negotiable.

First of all, the procedure of requesting an increase in your financial aid package is called an appeal, not a negotiation. Most schools have procedures for the appeal process. A valid appeal is based on what financial aid officers refer to as special circumstances.

So what is a special circumstance? Here are a few: job loss of a parent, excessive medical costs, care for an elderly grandparent, and termination of child support. A special circumstance does not include lack of proper planning in order to meet your Expected Family Contribution (EFC).

The Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form doesn’t have a place for your “story”. It’s a form that asks for information about the family’s income and assets as well as non-financial data like birthdates, social security numbers, size of family, number in college, etc. The appeal process allows you to tell your story, sometimes resulting in an adjustment of what might be an artificially high EFC.

There is also a situation commonly referred to as a competitive appeal. In the event that a student has a special talent or exceptional achievement – academic or otherwise, some schools may indeed adjust their initial awards when they become aware that another competitive school has offered a more generous award. This is analogous to a typical “supply and demand” scenario where the student, because of stellar performance, has earned a high demand for talent or achievement.

Fact of the week: Princeton University, while being one of the most highly-selective schools in the country, packages exceptionally generous financial aid, including no loans, no assessment on home equity and only a 5 percent assessment on student assets.

June 4, 2007

Advice new graduates don’t want to hear

Posted in Saving for College, The Financial Aid Process at 8:21 AM by Joe From Boston


Read this great article online at the New York Times.

More Advice Graduates Don’t Want to Hear

Last year at this time, as college graduates walked out into the world, I wrote a column giving advice on how they could save money.

In droves, parents sent the column to their children. And some of those children wrote to me to vent. What I suggested was impractical, many said. How would you like to try to live on $40,000 a year in Washington or San Francisco, several asked.

What I was proposing was not radical. It was mostly the simple things my mother had drummed into me. It was advice like diverting 10 percent of your income to savings before anything else and ignoring raises and putting them into savings, too. Learn to cook, I said, and never borrow money to pay for a depreciating asset.

I also suggested cutting out the latte habit, which was my symbol for those little things in life that when turned into a habit, add up to money that could have been spent on something worthwhile and memorable.

Other people, my wife among them, pointed out that I may have been too draconian on that point. Consistent savings is a lot easier if there are small rewards along the way; otherwise, life seems as if it is just one bowl of cold grass porridge after another.

Fine feedback, indeed, and my wife’s counsel reminds me that I should have added one other bit of advice: find a partner and stay together. Study after study show that two can live more cheaply together than each alone and that divorce is the great destroyer of wealth.

But, dear graduates, the crux of the advice is still compelling. While there may be a debate among economists about how much 50- and 60-year-olds should be saving for retirement, there is little dispute about how much the young should save: more.

Saving while young is critical. It isn’t just because of the power of compounding. By that I mean that if you start saving now it will build to a larger nest egg by the time you are 65 than if you wait to start at 45. Or to put it another way, you can save a smaller amount now rather than a larger amount later.

Bank $250 a month for 40 years in a I.R.A. or a 401(k) and you will receive about $500,000, assuming a 6 percent return. Start at age 45 and you would have to put in $1,078 a month to generate the same amount by age 65.

But there is another compelling reason to get into the habit of saving. (Here is where this column also turns into advice for the older folks who are giving you this to read.) People who save a lot get used to a lower rate of consumption while working, so less money is needed in retirement.

Stretching to save a little more yields a double dividend. You accumulate more assets and you lower the amount you will need in retirement because you will not have the habit of spending extravagantly to feel fulfilled.

Inevitably though, we return to the question: How can you possibly afford to put away that much? If you are only making $40,000, a not-untypical starting salary for a college-educated professional in a big city, the weekly gross of $769 works down to $561 in take-home pay after income taxes and payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicaid.

Were you to divert 10 percent of your salary to a 401(k) plan, the bottom line becomes $509.

In other words, a regular habit of savings costs you $52 a week. You easily frittered that away last week on things that you cannot even recall this week. A useful exercise that proves the point: For a week, try to list everywhere you spend cash or use your credit card.

Could you save another 10 percent a week, or $50? If you do, you are nearly set for life.

Can you live on $1,950 a month? Rents being what they are in certain cities like New York, San Francisco or Washington, sure, it will be tight. People do it by finding a roommate and watching their expenses (or asking for an occasional handout from Mom and Dad).

There may be another compelling reason to save and that is that while many aspects of retirement savings are predictable, the big unknowable is health care costs. “If you believe in the logic of the life cycle model, then once you get used to peanut butter, all else follows,” said Jonathan Skinner, a economics professor at Dartmouth College who has studied retirement issues and recently wrote a paper titled “Are You Sure You’re Saving Enough for Retirement?” for the National Bureau of Economic Research. “That’s the assumption that I am questioning: Do people want to be stuck in peanut butter in retirement?”

He said he came to the conclusion that a strategy to reduce retirement expenses “will be dwarfed by rapidly growing out-of-pocket medical expenses.” He noted projections based on the Health and Retirement Study, a survey of 22,000 Americans over the age of 50 sponsored by the National Institute on Aging found that by 2019, nearly a tenth of elderly retirees would be devoting more than half of their total income to out-of-pocket health expenses. He said, “These health care cost projections are perhaps the scariest beast under the bed.”

As Victor Fuchs, the professor emeritus of economics and health research and policy at Stanford University, told me, money is most useful when you are old because it makes all the difference whether you wait for a bus in the rain to get to the doctor’s appointment or you ride in a cab.

“Saving for retirement may ultimately be less about the golf condo at Hilton Head and more about being able to afford wheelchair lifts, private nurses and a high-quality nursing home,” Professor Skinner said.

His best advice for people in their 20s and 30s: maximize workplace matching contributions, seek automatic savings mechanisms like home mortgages and hope “that their generation can still look forward to solvent Social Security and Medicare programs.”

Over the last two years I’ve been dispensing advice in this space about how to spend and save more wisely. This will be my last column for a spell as I am taking on editing duties that give me little time for reporting. But before I go, I want to remind the young graduates, their parents who scrimped and saved to get them there, and anyone else who stuck with me this far that are a few other rules of life worth considering.

Among them are the following. Links are available at nytimes.com/business:

*Never pay a real estate agent a 6 percent commission.

*Buy used things, except maybe used tires.

*Get on the do-not-call list and other do-not-solicit lists so you can’t be tempted.

*Watch infomercials for their entertainment value only.

*Know what your credit reports say, but don’t pay for that knowledge: go to www.annualcreditreport.com to get them.

*Consolidate your cable, phone and Internet service to get the best deal.

*Resist the lunacy of buying premium products like $2,000-a-pound chocolates.

*Lose weight. Carrying extra pounds costs tens of thousands of dollars over a lifetime.

*Do not use your home as a piggy bank if home prices are flat or going down or if interest rates are rising.

*Enroll in a 401(k) at work immediately.

*Postpone buying high-tech products like PCs, digital cameras and high-definition TVs for as long as possible. And then buy after the selling season or buy older technology just as a new technology comes along.

*And, I’m sorry, I’m really serious about this last one: make your own coffee.

May 30, 2007

Variable Student Loan Interest Rates Rise Slightly July 1, 2007

Posted in Parent PLUS Loans, Stafford Loans, Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 9:26 AM by Joe From Boston


Student loan interest rates for federal loans disbursed between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 2006 will rise slightly when the rates are reset on July 1, 2007.

The interest rate for Stafford loans in repayment will change from 7.14 to 7.22 percent. Stafford loans in an in-school, grace or deferment status will change from 6.54 to 6.62 percent.

PLUS loans will increase from 7.94 to 8.02 percent. The U.S. Department of Education will officially announce these changes in the near future.

For Stafford loans disbursed on or since July 1, 2006, the interest rate remains fixed at 6.8 percent and PLUS loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2006 remain fixed at 8.5 percent.

To read more, visit http://www.treasurydirect.gov/RI/OFBills and http://www.financialaidpodcast.com/2007/05/30/fap544-new-student-loan-rates-set-latinos-and-financial-aid-military-student-loans-sophia-ramos/

May 29, 2007

Elite Colleges Open New Door to Low-Income Youths

Posted in Saving for College, Student Loan News, The Financial Aid Process at 9:59 AM by Joe From Boston


Here’s a great article from the New York Times.

Elite Colleges Open New Door to Low-Income Youths

AMHERST, Mass. — The discussion in the States of Poverty seminar here at Amherst College was getting a little theoretical. Then Anthony Abraham Jack, a junior from Miami, asked pointedly, “Has anyone here ever actually seen a food stamp?”

To Mr. Jack, unlike many of his classmates, food stamps are not an abstraction. His family has had to use them in emergencies. His mother raised three children as a single parent and earns $26,000 a year as a school security guard. That is just a little more than half the cost of a year’s tuition, room and board, fees and other expenses at Amherst, which for Mr. Jack’s class was close to $48,000.

So when Mr. Jack, now 22 and a senior, graduated with honors here on Sunday, he was not just the first in his family to earn a college degree, but a success story in the effort by Amherst and a growing number of elite colleges to open their doors to talented low-income students.

Concerned that the barriers to elite institutions are being increasingly drawn along class lines, and wanting to maintain some role as engines of social mobility, about two dozen schools — Amherst, Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, the University of Virginia, Williams and the University of North Carolina, among them — have pushed in the past few years to diversify economically.

They are trying tactics like replacing loans with grants and curtailing early admission, which favors the well-to-do and savvy. But most important, Amherst, for instance, is doing more than giving money to low-income students; it is recruiting them and taking their socioeconomic background — defined by family income, parents’ education and occupation level — into account when making admissions decisions.

Amherst’s president, Anthony Marx, turns to stark numbers in a 2004 study by the Century Foundation, a policy institute in New York, to explain the effort: Three-quarters of students at top colleges come from the top socioeconomic quartile, with only one-tenth from the poorer half and 3 percent from the bottom quartile.

“We want talent from across all divides, wherever we can find it,” President Marx said. Amherst covered the full cost of Mr. Jack’s education beyond what he earned in work-study. The only debt he says he owes is the $41 it cost to make copies of his 107-page honors thesis.

Amherst also provides its low-income students important support, from $400 “start-up grants” for winter coats and sheets and blankets for their dorm rooms, to summer science and math tutoring. At the same time, low-income students are expected to put in at least seven hours a week at $8-an-hour work-study jobs.

But they get to use $200 a month in their work-study earnings as spending money to get a haircut, for instance, or go out for pizza with classmates so they don’t feel excluded.

Mr. Jack, who is black and had never been on a plane until he flew to Amherst for his first visit, arrived as an A student, and with a steely focus.

His mother, Marilyn, 53, had guided her son from Head Start to a gifted program in elementary school to a magnet middle school and, in his final year of high school, to the private Gulliver Preparatory School on a full scholarship. But she never had to push Tony, she said. “He was on a mission from Day 1,” she said.

Mr. Jack’s high grades and test scores — a respectable 1200 on the SAT — won him a full scholarship to the University of Florida. But the median score for his Amherst class was 1422, and he would have been excluded had the admissions office not considered his socioeconomic class, and the obstacles he had overcome.

“Tony Jack with his pure intelligence — had he been raised in Greenwich, he would have been a 1500 kid,” said Tom Parker, the dean of admission. “He would have been tutored by Kaplan or Princeton Review. He would have had The New Yorker magazine on the coffee table.”

“Tony Jack is not an anomaly,” he added.

Mr. Jack, Amherst officials say, would likely not have benefited under traditional affirmative action programs. In their groundbreaking 1998 study of 28 selective universities, William Bowen, the former president of Princeton, and Derek Bok, now the interim president of Harvard, found that 86 percent of blacks who enrolled were middle or upper middle class. (Amherst was not included in that study.) The white students were even wealthier.

“Universities have prided themselves on making strides in racial diversity, but for the most part they have avoided the larger issue of class inequality,” said Richard D. Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation.

For Mr. Jack, there were adjustments at this college, where half the students are affluent enough that their parents pay tuition without any aid from Amherst. He did not let it bother him, he said, when wealthier classmates blithely inquired about the best clubs in Miami — as if he would know, Mr. Jack said dryly — before flying off to his hometown for spring break. Mr. Jack could afford to go home only at Christmas, and the end of the year, when Amherst paid his plane fare.

Mr. Jack is 6 foot 7 and built like the football player he used to be. In his freshman year, he said, he was walking to his dorm one night when a police car seemed to be following him. He recalled showing the officer his Amherst ID and explaining, “I’m a student here.”

In Mr. Jack’s class of 413, 15 percent, or 61, students, are from families with incomes of less than $45,000 a year; about two-thirds of those are from families earning less than $30,000. He was amazed to discover how much preparation wealthier students had.

“People are groomed for the SAT,” Mr. Jack said. “They take Latin to help them with their vocabulary.”

He seized every opportunity Amherst offered — the pre-freshman summer program in science and math, help from the writing center and faculty office hours. “They didn’t just invite me in,” he said. “They prepared the way.”

For his freshman year, he chose the most challenging classes, including Chemical Principles, even though he had no chemistry in high school. “I didn’t feel like I was in over my head,” he said. “I just felt like I was being pushed to the boundaries of my ability.”

He got all A’s and B’s his first year, except for a C-plus in chemistry. Sophomore year he plunged in even deeper, taking Organic Chemistry I and II. He got a B the first semester, and an A-minus the second.

“Organic chemistry was the happiest time of my life,” said Mr. Jack, who tends to gush about Amherst. “Everything started clicking.”

David Hansen, who taught Organic Chemistry II, called Mr. Jack’s improvement remarkable: “He had the motivation and the desire and the discipline to take advantage of the support that was here.”

Mr. Jack, who is as gregarious as he is studious, found time to mentor other students, serve on committees — and earn an A-plus in calculus last year, one of only 10 A-pluses the professor, David Cox, said he has given out in calculus in 30 years of teaching. This year Mr. Jack was Amherst’s nominee to be a Rhodes scholar at Oxford.

Squeamish about blood, Mr. Jack switched his major from pre-med to religion and gender studies. He said he intended to go to graduate school. For now, he loves Amherst so much, he is staying around as an “alumni fellow,” organizing events on campus. He says he thinks about teaching, or becoming a lawyer so that he can help his community. As for money, he says he just wants to be able to take care of his family.

At Amherst’s commencement on Sunday, Mr. Jack wept — and his classmates gave him a standing ovation — when President Marx awarded him the annual prize for the senior who has “shown by his or her own determination and accomplishment the greatest appreciation of and desire for a college education.”

Thanks to Amherst, Mr. Jack said, he has rewritten the narrative of his life. It isn’t about “a poor black student” going “from the bottom to the top,” as he once believed, he wrote in an essay about his family and all they have done for him. His mother, his older brother, his younger sister and his two nieces were here at graduation, having driven up in a rented van from Miami.

“Being a senior at Amherst is only one step along my journey through life,” he wrote. “You want to know Anthony Abraham Jack, then look behind the man you see walking around campus today. And you, in doing so, surely will never say that he came from the bottom and is now at the top.”

May 18, 2007

Do Perkins Loans need to be re-paid?

Posted in Grants, Scholarships, The Financial Aid Process at 3:13 PM by Joe From Boston


Here’s a question I’ve heard a lot recently:

Do Perkins loans have to be repaid?

And the answer is an overwhelming YES!  It’s a loan therefore it must be repaid.   The Perkins loan is a low-interest rate loan for undergraduate and graduate students which exceptional need.  Most people will not get a Perkins loan.

All loans must be repaid – you are borrowing money from someone else (in the case of Perkins loans, you borrower from the U.S. government) and must pay it back.  That is why I highly recommend you find as many grants and scholarships as you can.  Grants and scholarships are free money and do not need to be repaid.

Previous page · Next page